How to migrate from legacy integration systems to WSO2

What if the system your organisation depends on every day is the same one quietly slowing everything down?
In many companies, legacy integration systems continue running out of habit rather than capability. They were reliable once, but over time they become rigid, complex and increasingly difficult to maintain. Small changes take weeks, performance declines, costs rise and new ideas struggle to move beyond the planning stage.

Most teams recognise the need to move on, yet the path forward often feels uncertain. How do you modernise without risking core operations? Where do you even begin?

The truth is that transitioning to a modern WSO2-based integration landscape can be far more structured and far less disruptive than many expect. With the right approach, organisations can gradually replace outdated systems, improve stability and prepare for future growth without unnecessary turbulence.

This article walks through how to shift from legacy integration systems to WSO2 using a clear, phased and practical method designed to reduce risk and keep your business running smoothly throughout the journey.

Steps to migrate from a legacy integration system to WSO2

Migrating to WSO2 requires a structured, well-sequenced approach to ensure stability and reduce risk. Below are the key steps that guide the transition from an ageing integration system to a modern WSO2-based architecture:

1. Discovery: fully understanding the current landscape

Before any migration work begins, you must gain a complete and accurate understanding of your existing integration environment. This phase lays the foundation for every decision that follows and a weak discovery stage almost always leads to unexpected issues later in the project.

Key activities

• Catalogue all integrations
  Identify every service, API, message flow, scheduled job, file transfer, connector and adapter currently in use. Include both well-documented and “hidden” integrations that may only reveal themselves through logs or stakeholder conversations.
• Analyse technologies and protocols
  Document all protocols (HTTP, SOAP, REST, FTP, JMS, JDBC, proprietary ones), message formats (XML, JSON, CSV, fixed-length files) and transformation logic.
• Map dependencies and interactions
  Trace how systems communicate with each other: internal applications, third-party services, SaaS platforms, data sources and message brokers. Understanding upstream/downstream impacts is essential for planning migration waves.
• Document security and operational constraints
  Record authentication and authorisation methods, certificates, keys, IP whitelisting, access tokens, throttling rules, rate limits, timeouts and any compliance requirements.
• Capture undocumented knowledge
  Speak with architects, developers, operators and business owners to uncover behaviours, workarounds, manual interventions, implicit rules and operational nuances that may not exist in formal documentation.

Outputs

• A integration inventory listing all integrations, their purpose, technologies, dependencies and migration complexity.
• A current-state architecture diagram showing systems, data flows, interfaces and communication patterns.
• A list of risks, pain points and technical debt to avoid reproducing in the new WSO2 environment.
• A prioritised view of which integrations are vital, which are fragile and which may be retired instead of migrated.

2. Assessment and planning

With a clear understanding of the current integration landscape, the next step is to assess the effort required to migrate each component and to create a structured, risk-aware plan. This phase turns raw discovery data into actionable insight, allowing you to decide what should be migrated, how it should be approached and in what order.

Classify each integration according to:

• Criticality (high, medium, low).
• Complexity (simple pass-through, transformation + routing, heavy orchestration, custom logic).
• Estimated migration effort.
• Frequency of change (stable or constantly updated).

Decide the migration treatment

• Re-implement: the default and usually the best choice.
• Automate: if tooling exists for your legacy platform.
• Retire: remove obsolete, unused or duplicated flows.
• Wrap or re-host: where rewriting is not economical.

Define migration waves

• Wave 1: Low-risk internal flows and simple services.
• Wave 2: Medium criticality services and commonly used APIs.
• Wave 3: Highly critical, transactional and customer-facing integrations.

3. Designing the target architecture

Designing the target architecture is the moment where the migration stops being a technical obligation and becomes a genuine opportunity for improvement. Rather than duplicating the limitations of the legacy platform, this phase focuses on creating a modern, maintainable and scalable integration architecture that will support the organisation for years to come.

Decisions to make:

Architectural model

• Centralised ESB-style runtime.
• Distributed/microservice-style integration.
• A hybrid approach combining the best of both.

Integration patterns

• Content-based routing.
• Message transformation.
• Publish/subscribe.
• Split–aggregate.
• Simple orchestration.
• Event-driven patterns where appropriate.

Standardisation

• A common error format.
• Security standards (OAuth2/OIDC, mutual TLS, certificate rotation).
• Correlation IDs for traceability.
• Standard logging structure and validation strategies.

Infrastructure

• Decide between Kubernetes, containers, virtual machines, cloud or hybrid.
• Build CI/CD pipelines for building and deploying integration artefacts.
• Set up full observability: logs, metrics, traces and alerting.

4. Preparing WSO2 Platform

With the target architecture defined, the next step is to prepare the WSO2 platform so that it is stable, secure and ready to receive migrated integrations. This phase ensures that the foundation is solid: the environments are properly set up, operational standards are established and all supporting processes are in place. A well-prepared platform significantly reduces migration risk and accelerates implementation.

Essential tasks

• Set up all environments (Development, Test, UAT, Pre-production, Production).
• Configure security (secrets, tokens, certificates, encryption policies).
• Establish CI/CD pipelines for build and deployment.
• Decide repository structure and branching strategy.
• Set up monitoring dashboards and operational alerts.
• Create reusable templates, including: error-handling sequences, logging frameworks, shared policies and mediation snippets.

5. Implementation and phased migration

With the platform ready and the plan defined, the migration enters its most visible stage: implementing new integrations and moving them into production in controlled phases. The goal is not only to replicate existing behaviour but to deliver cleaner, more maintainable and more resilient integrations while minimising risk to the business. A phased migration approach ensures stability, supports early feedback and allows lessons learned to be applied continuously.

5.1 Re-implement each integration

• Create the inbound endpoint (HTTP, JMS, file, scheduled, etc.).
• Build the mediation sequence:
  validation → transformation → routing → enrichment → error handling.
• Use standardised patterns so all integrations behave consistently.
• Reuse shared templates and components to avoid duplication.

5.2 Testing

• Unit testing for all components.
• Integration testing with downstream systems.
• Regression comparison: compare outputs from legacy system vs WSO2 for the same input.
• Performance testing to confirm SLAs are met or exceeded.

5.3 Dual running (parallel operation)

• Run the legacy system and WSO2 versions side by side.
• Replicate traffic or run controlled parallel tests.
• Validate behaviour, logs, metrics and reliability before switching consumers to the new platform.

6. Cutover and operational stabilisation

Cutover is the point at which responsibility for live traffic shifts from the legacy system to WSO2. It is a critical stage that demands careful orchestration, thorough monitoring and clear communication. The aim is to transition with minimal disruption while ensuring that the new platform performs reliably under real-world conditions. Once cutover is complete, a period of operational stabilisation ensures the environment is robust, tuned and ready for long-term operation.

Cutover strategy

• Redirect a small percentage of consumers first (internal teams or low-impact clients).
• Monitor behaviour, latency, throughput and error rates.
• Increase traffic gradually until full cutover is achieved.
• Always maintain a quick rollback option during early phases.

Post-cutover

• Tune thread pools, connection pools, caching and rate limits.
• Improve observability dashboards based on real usage.
• Optimise logs and alerts to reduce noise and highlight true anomalies.

7. Retiring the legacy platform

Once integrations have been successfully migrated and stabilised in the WSO2 environment, attention shifts to retiring the legacy system. This phase is essential for realising the full benefits of the migration reducing operational overheads, removing technical debt and simplifying the overall technology landscape. Retirement should be approached methodically to ensure that nothing essential is left behind and that all business and technical risks are mitigated.

• Retire legacy flows and disable old adapters or schedulers.
• Decommission old servers, licences and infrastructure.
• Remove temporary routing toggles and fallback logic.
• Update all documentation to reflect the new WSO2-based environment.

Typical mistakes to avoid when migrating from legacy integration systems to WSO2

Even with a solid strategy, integration migrations can encounter avoidable challenges. Being aware of these common pitfalls helps ensure a smoother transition, reduces risk and increases the likelihood of long-term success. The following issues frequently arise during migrations to WSO2 and should be considered early in the project.

Common pitfalls:

• Replicating the legacy system instead of modernising it
  One of the most frequent mistakes is attempting a like-for-like copy of the old platform. This often carries over technical debt, outdated patterns and unnecessary complexity. The migration is an opportunity to improve, simplify and adopt modern architectural practices.
• Insufficient discovery leading to late surprises
  Missing hidden dependencies, undocumented behaviours or rarely used integrations can cause unexpected failures during cutover. Thorough discovery prevents issues that only surface once the legacy system is switched off.
• Attempting a big-bang migration
  Migrating everything at once greatly increases risk and reduces visibility when issues arise. A staged, wave-based approach with controlled cutovers is far safer and more manageable.
• Neglecting non-functional requirements (NFRs)
  Performance, scalability, security, observability and resilience must be considered from the outset. Addressing them late leads to rework, instability and longer delivery cycles.
• Lack of consistent standards and reusable components
  Allowing each team to develop in its own style results in inconsistent behaviour, duplicated logic and increased maintenance effort. Establishing design standards and shared templates early is crucial.
• Underestimating the importance of testing
  Inadequate functional, regression or performance testing can cause issues to slip into production. A disciplined testing strategy is vital, including comparisons with legacy outputs and dual-running where appropriate.
• Weak operational readiness
  Deploying integrations without complete monitoring, alerting, dashboards and logs makes diagnosing issues difficult. Operations teams need clear visibility from day one.
• No defined rollback strategy
  Without a reliable and tested rollback plan, unexpected issues during cutover can lead to extended outages. Rollback must be simple, well-documented and rehearsed.
• Insufficient communication between teams
  Integrations often span multiple departments and systems. Poor communication can lead to misaligned expectations, schedule conflicts and overlooked dependencies.
• Failure to retire legacy components properly
  Leaving parts of the legacy system running (intentionally or accidentally) creates confusion, operational risk and unnecessary cost. A structured decommissioning plan is essential.

Conclusion

Modernising an organisation’s integration landscape is never a small undertaking, but it is one of the most rewarding. Migrating from a legacy system to WSO2 is not merely a technical upgrade, it is an opportunity to eliminate years of accumulated complexity, regain agility, reduce operational risk and build a foundation that truly supports future growth.

The organisations that succeed are those that treat integration as a strategic capability, not just a background system. With careful planning, disciplined execution and the right architectural choices, WSO2 becomes a modern, reliable and adaptable core that enables the business to innovate faster and respond to change with confidence.

The journey may be challenging, but the destination a cleaner, smarter and future-proof integration ecosystem is undoubtedly worth it.

If you want a trusted WSO2 partner to make your transition to WSO2 smooth, secure and future-proof, get in touch with us.

Still evaluating WSO2? Have questions before moving to WSO2? Want expert support for a WSO2 migration?

Let Claria, certified WSO2 partners, guide you.

Get in touch

Mariluz Usero

Share