Gradle vs Maven: Which one is the best choice for your project?

In software development, especially within the Java ecosystem, efficient project management and build automation tools are critical to delivering high-quality applications on time. Among the numerous tools available, Gradle and Maven stand out as two of the most widely used and respected options. Both programming tools are designed to simplify repetitive tasks such as compiling code, managing dependencies, running tests and packaging applications. However, they offer different approaches and features that can make one a better fit than the other depending on your specific use case.

Choosing the right build tool is no trivial matter. The tool you select will directly impact the productivity of your development team, the maintainability of your build scripts and even the performance of your builds as your project scales. For example, a small, straightforward Java application might not require the advanced features of Gradle, while a large, complex project with extensive custom requirements may quickly outgrow Maven's capabilities.

This article delves into the core aspects of Gradle and Maven, providing a detailed comparison of their features, strengths and weaknesses. By understanding how Gradle and Maven differ in their approach to configuration, performance, flexibility and community support, you can choose the tool that best aligns with your project's goals and your team's expertise.

Let’s explore each tool in depth and compare them across various dimensions to determine which one is the ideal choice for your development workflow.

What is Maven?

Maven is an XML-based build tool that has been a cornerstone of Java project management since its release in 2004. Developed as an improvement over Apache Ant, Maven introduced a standardised approach to managing project lifecycles and dependencies, which significantly simplified the development process for Java applications. Its declarative configuration model revolves around a single pom.xml file, which defines project settings, dependencies and build instructions.

Key features of Maven

Maven adds the following features to Apache Ant:

1. Declarative build configuration: Maven’s declarative approach means that developers define the “what” (e.g., dependencies and plugins) instead of the “how” (e.g., procedural scripts). This reduces the complexity of writing and maintaining build scripts.
2. XML-based project configuration: Maven relies on a central pom.xml (Project Object Model) file. This XML file specifies project metadata, dependencies, plugins and build configurations. While verbose, its structure is straightforward and allows for consistency across projects.
3. Convention over configuration: Maven emphasizes a standardized project structure. For instance, it expects source files to reside in the src/main/java directory and test files in src/test/java. This consistency minimizes the need for extensive configuration, allowing developers to focus on coding rather than setting up project directories.
4. Dependency management: Maven automates the inclusion of external libraries. Developers declare dependencies in the pom.xml and Maven handles retrieval, version management and transitive dependencies (dependencies of your dependencies).
5. Customisability with Plugins: Developers can extend Maven's capabilities by adding plugins to the pom.xml. Custom plugins are created by implementing the AbstractMojo class, enabling tailored functionality.
6. Community and documentation: With decades of use in the industry, Maven boasts extensive documentation and a vast user community. This ensures robust support and a wealth of resources for troubleshooting and learning.
7. Lifecycle Management: Maven organizes the build process into phases (e.g., compile, test, package, install, deploy). These phases ensure consistency and automation across tasks without requiring extensive configuration.

Maven in action: HelloWorld Example

Below is a sample pom.xml file demonstrating a basic Maven project setup:

1<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
2<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
3   xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 https://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
4   <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
5   <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
6   <artifactId>gs-maven</artifactId>
7   <packaging>jar</packaging>
8   <version>0.1.0</version>
9   <properties>
10       <maven.compiler.source>1.8</maven.compiler.source>
11       <maven.compiler.target>1.8</maven.compiler.target>
12   </properties>
13   <dependencies>
14       <dependency>
15           <groupId>joda-time</groupId>
16           <artifactId>joda-time</artifactId>
17           <version>2.9.2</version>
18       </dependency>
19       <dependency>
20           <groupId>junit</groupId>
21           <artifactId>junit</artifactId>
22           <version>4.12</version>
23           <scope>test</scope>
24       </dependency>
25   </dependencies>
26</project>

What is Gradle?

Gradle is a modern build automation tool introduced in 2007. It combines the best aspects of Maven and Ant, offering the declarative nature of Maven and the flexibility of Ant’s scripting capabilities. Unlike Maven, Gradle uses Groovy (or optionally Kotlin) as its configuration language, providing a more expressive and dynamic way to define builds.

Key features of Gradle

Gradle adds the following features of Maven:

1. Incremental and parallel builds: One of Gradle’s standout features is its performance optimisation. Gradle detects changes in inputs and outputs, skipping unnecessary tasks during subsequent builds. Additionally, it executes tasks in parallel where possible, significantly reducing build times for large projects.
2. Support for multiple languages: While Maven primarily targets Java projects, Gradle is a multi-language build tool. It supports Java, Kotlin, Groovy, Android, Scala and even native languages like C++.
3. Rich customization: Gradle allows developers to create and customise tasks directly within build.gradle files. This eliminates the need for additional Java code to extend functionality, as seen with Maven plugins.
4. Lifecycle management: It adds the ability to support the entire software life process (including compilation, testing, statistical analysis and implementation).
5. Declarative and imperative configuration: Gradle replaces XML with Groovy (or optionally Kotlin) DSL for configuration, allowing both declarative and programmatic task definitions. This hybrid model is more concise and flexible than Maven’s XML-based approach.

Gradle in action: HelloWorld example

Below is an example of a Gradle configuration for the same project:

1apply plugin: 'java'
2apply plugin: 'eclipse'
3apply plugin: 'application'
4mainClassName = 'hello.HelloWorld'
5repositories {
6   mavenCentral()
7}
8jar {
9   baseName = 'gs-gradle'
10   version =  '0.1.0'
11}
12sourceCompatibility = 1.8
13targetCompatibility = 1.8
14dependencies {
15   compile "joda-time:joda-time:2.2"
16   testCompile "junit:junit:4.12"
17

Gradle simplifies task customization by embedding logic directly in the build.gradle file:

1println 'This is executed during the configuration phase.'
2task configured {
3   println 'This is also executed during the configuration phase.'
4}

Gradle vs Maven: A detailed comparison

Choosing between Gradle and Maven requires an understanding of their unique characteristics, strengths and how they approach build and project management. While both tools serve similar purposes, their design philosophies make them better suited for different project types. Below is an in-depth comparison of Gradle and Maven across various aspects.

This table highlights the distinct advantages and trade-offs between Gradle and Maven, making it easier to decide which tool aligns best with your project needs and team capabilities.

Maven or Gradle? Which one should I choose for my project?

Choosing between Maven and Gradle depends on the specific requirements of your project, the expertise of your team and the priorities of your organisation.

When to choose Maven

Maven is an excellent choice for teams and projects that prioritise simplicity and convention over configuration. It’s particularly suitable for:

• Standardised projects: If your project structure follows standard conventions, Maven provides a straightforward setup with minimal configuration. You can get started quickly and focus on development rather than tweaking build configurations.
• Established teams: Many teams are already familiar with Maven due to its longevity. If your team has experience with Maven, sticking with it can reduce onboarding time and potential learning curves.
• Smaller or less complex projects: For projects that don’t have unique build requirements or need minimal customisation, Maven’s declarative approach is sufficient and efficient.
• Broad plugin ecosystem: Maven boasts a mature ecosystem of plugins, which can simplify integrations with testing frameworks, deployment tools and CI/CD pipelines. Its extensive documentation and community support make troubleshooting easier.
• Compatibility with Legacy Systems: If your organisation relies on older systems or tools, Maven’s widespread compatibility ensures smoother integration and fewer potential issues.

While Maven has its limitations in flexibility, it shines in scenarios where a predictable and structured approach is needed. It’s also a safer option for teams looking to adopt well-established tools with a proven track record.

When to choose Gradle

Gradle excels in projects that demand speed, flexibility and customisation. It is particularly advantageous for:

• Complex projects: If your project has unique or non-standard build requirements, Gradle’s flexibility allows you to tailor the build process to your specific needs. The ability to write custom build scripts in Groovy or Kotlin provides immense power.
• Performance-driven environments: Gradle’s incremental builds and caching mechanisms significantly reduce build times, making it ideal for large-scale projects where speed is critical.
• Modern development practices: Gradle integrates seamlessly with modern development tools like Android Studio. It’s the default build system for Android projects, making it a natural choice for mobile development.
• Teams with programming expertise: If your team is comfortable writing scripts in Groovy or Kotlin, Gradle offers unparalleled flexibility and control. You can create highly customized build logic that goes beyond Maven’s capabilities.
• Adoption of cutting-edge features: Gradle’s active development ensures it stays up-to-date with the latest industry trends. Features like Kotlin DSL and support for modern dependency management paradigms make it future-proof.

Gradle is an excellent choice for developers and teams who value adaptability and need to optimize build performance. While it may require a steeper learning curve, the investment often pays off in efficiency and customization.

Conclusion

Both Gradle and Maven are great tools that can meet the majority of project management needs. Maven stands out for its simplicity and established adoption, while Gradle excels in performance and flexibility. The decision ultimately depends on your project’s needs and your team’s familiarity with these tools.

By carefully evaluating the strengths and limitations of both tools, you can select the one that aligns with your development goals and ensures a smooth, efficient workflow for your project. 

Which tool will you choose for your next project? 

If you’re still unsure which tool is the best fit for your project, we’re here to help! Our team of experts can provide tailored advice to ensure you make the right choice. With years of experience in software development and project management, we understand the nuances of both Maven and Gradle, and we can guide you through the selection process. Contact us today!

Talk to our experts!

Contact our team and discover the cutting-edge technologies that will empower your business.

Get in touch

Mariluz Usero

Share